Delay in SCO justice gives Microsoft hope

SCO . Novell owns .

So does this mean any legal threat from Microsoft against Linux is ?

I don’t think so. Here’s why.

1. Microsoft’s claims are based on , and copyright is not at issue. That’s what tripped up SCO.
2. The SCO case cost to litigate. The threat of such expenses, even if they were right, must have been part of the calculus Linux vendors used before signing with Microsoft.
3. Novell, which won the copyright portion of the SCO suit, .
4. SCO went of the food chain, attacking IBM first. Any Microsoft strategy will deal first with smaller vendors. That has been its since Novell.

Now there is hope on the other side. Getting Google into the Open Invention Network . IBM, NEC, Novell, Philips, Red Hat and Sony are also part of this .

Before going to court Microsoft needs to craft a case which will not bring in the OIN, against a vendor too small to protect itself. Killing some small vendor will put the fear of Redmond back into the market.

One more point. Microsoft has some very, very smart lawyers.

This story is not over.